Multiple systematic reviews: methods for assessing discordances of results
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Assessing variability in results in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies
BACKGROUND To describe approaches used in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies for assessing variability in estimates of accuracy between studies and to provide guidance in this area. METHODS Meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies published between May and September 2012 were systematically identified. Information on how the variability in results was investigated...
متن کاملAssessing abstracts of Iranian systematic reviews and meta-analysis indexed in WOS and Scopus using PRISMA
Background: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis have significant advantages over conventional reviews in that all available data should be presented. This study aimed to evaluate Iranian systematic reviews and meta-analysis abstracts indexed in WOS and Scopus during 2003-2012 based on PRISMA checklist. Methods: This is an analytical study. We evaluated 46 article abstracts ...
متن کاملAssessing ethics of trials in systematic reviews.
Our awareness of the requirements for ethical clinical research has increased over the past century. Research ethics committees were set up after the Declaration of Helsinki to review research proposals. Many journals now require a statement that ethical approval has been obtained before they consider a research report for publication. Nevertheless, many published studies do not come up to stan...
متن کاملMethods employed for other systematic reviews.
Two separate groups of reviewers were involved in the Consensus Development Conference on Diagnosis and Management of Dental Caries Throughout Life. The training of the independent reviewers and the methodology they used differed from that of the team at the Research Triangle Institute and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (RTI/UNC).
متن کاملMethods for setting priorities in systematic reviews.
Development and assessment of methods for setting priorities for systematic reviews is developing into a field of increasing interest amongst such groups as the AHRQ and NICE [1,2]. The Cochrane Collaboration has recently established a new Methods group entitled the ‘‘Cochrane Agenda and Priority Setting Methods Group’’ to develop methodology and advise The Cochrane Collaboration on how the val...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Internal and Emergency Medicine
سال: 2012
ISSN: 1828-0447,1970-9366
DOI: 10.1007/s11739-012-0846-1